Skip to content
Click on cover to enlarge

Election After-Math

«  page 2 of 2  »

The chimeric effect of the polls turned us into strategic voters. The question was how should I vote to avoid this or that.

by Ken Alexander

Published in the April 2006 issue.  » BUY ISSUE     

Bookmark and Share             Facebook         Stumble      Get The Walrus on your Blackberry or Windows Mobile        RSS


But Mr. Harper did his math post-election. “Disallow the Liberal/Bloc potential by bribing Mr. Emerson — whose Vancouver riding supported us with a whopping 19 percent — to cross the floor. What is one Cabinet position for a turncoat worth?” Harper must have thought. “The natural governing party, the Liberals, asked such questions for years. It served them well and kept us in the principled wilderness. Well, my new hedonic calculus, my will to power, now dictates that I too can hold the electorate in contempt, that voting is nothing but a parlour game that I control.”

But there may be an upside to all these numbers games. As the popularity of Sudoku is proving, numbers — the placing of one here to offset another there — can be seductive and sublime. And as the polls turned us all into strategic voters, our number became the X marked on a ballot. It felt good, frankly, to be in the game of calibrating outcomes, especially given the result — a virtual non-government in a country that obviously relishes abstractions.

And then there was Harper’s election after-math. While we obsessed over fractions, he introduced a whole new arithmetic.

Comments

Comment on this article


Will not be displayed on the site

Submit a comment online

Submit a letter to the Editor


    Cancel

The Walrus E-Newsletter

Online exclusives, events, offers:
get news of everything Walrus.


Article Tools

»    RSS Feed      Bookmark and Share

»  Printer-friendly page

»  Email this article

»  Comment on this article

»  More in this issue

»  More in Sightings

»  More from Ken Alexander

»  BUY THIS ISSUE

ADVERTISE WITH US