Skip to content
Click on cover to enlarge

June 2007

«  page 4 of 5  »

by The Walrus Readers

Published in the June 2007 issue.  » BUY ISSUE     

          Facebook         Stumble      Get The Walrus on your Blackberry or Windows Mobile        RSS



Something is going to destroy the unnaturally old pine stands of the Canadian Rockies, be it fire or disease . . . . How strange: little insects that selectively and neatly kill only certain tree species, opening up the woods naturally, without removing nutrients or damaging the soil, are used as an excuse by humans to wreck an entire ecosystem.

That was originally written in 1985.
Ben Gadd
Jasper, Alberta


Dogma
Alison Gillmor (“It’s a Dog’s Life,” April) says doggie author Jon Katz “counsels us to be aware of what we’re asking of dogs and why we’re asking it.” When I ask anything of my dogs (two rescue schnauzers), they’re usually okay with it after I tell them why I am asking. A good explanation goes a lot further than “because I said so.”
Shelagh Rogers
Vancouver, British Columbia


Reserve Judgment
Peter MacDonald’s April letter in response to Larry Krotz’s (“Separate and Unequal,” February) awakened in me a memory, dormant for thirty-seven years, that may be germane to the issue of native education.

At the time, I was employed with the new Department of Development in Prince Edward Island, which had a mandate rooted in a federal-provincial agreement on social and economic development. Given the resources then available, I thought there might be an opportunity for me to bring some program assistance to the Mi’kmaq community on pei. I drove to Lennox Island Reserve to meet with a young woman activist, whose name I no longer remember, to discuss means for motivating children to take a greater interest in school.

“Why should native children stay in school? ” she asked. “They begin school with the Dick and Jane readers, learning about white kids doing things that native kids never do, in homes they never get to live in. Readers in the later grades are about white people’s achievements, which may have come at a cost to our own people.

“Then they are asked to learn arithmetic: ‘Find the area of a field,’ the book says, but there are no fields on many reserves. In geography, they must learn about strange countries and their capital cities, but countries and boundaries are not part of our experience. For us, it would be more useful to learn about streams, lakes, and rivers — our travel routes, where the fish are. And the history taught in school is white man’s history, in which our own people are shown as savages. The lessons are about wars among Europeans, about British kings and their generals, lessons even white kids don’t have any interest in.

Comments (1 comments)

warrenwormhole: Andrew, what I find astounding as I read the countless "refutations" of Harris catalogued by you and others is the obvious and blatant fact that you have not read "The End of Faith" closely enough to realize (or even acknowledge) the completely satisfactory treatment of all the points you raise in your article. Use the Bible as our source of morality (or the Quran, or whatever)? Which passages should we take and which should we cherry-pick? Why the absolute need for people who subcribe to your beliefs on morality to cherry-pick? Precisely because morality has been, IS and always will be subject to drift. During the millenia before Christ, Muhamed and the FSM I am sure you are willing to admit that we as humans were still faced with the difficult problem of morality. Thanks to an ever increasing reality-based view of the Universe, we move ever closer to jettisoning the baggage of religious dogma. Why? It's usefulness as an absolute reference on morality can only be taken seriously by an ever diminishing group of people that cling to the existence (unable to face the alternative) of a divine creator/suppier of absolute moral law. As Harris points out, there may be many reasons to cling to such beliefs, but those reasons have little to do with truth claims of such a being's existence nor of the need to have an externally imposed morality. The problem has been and is still is difficult-a secularly defined moral code-and one that might never be ultimately achieved. This does not constitute an argument for clinging to fairy tales.

May 13, 2007 00:34 EST

Comment on this article


Will not be displayed on the site

Submit a comment online

Submit a letter to the Editor


    Cancel

The Walrus E-Newsletter

Online exclusives, events, offers:
get news of everything Walrus.