Skip to content

October 2007

«  page 2 of 4  »

by The Walrus Readers

Published in the October 2007 issue.  » BUY ISSUE     

Bookmark and Share       Post to MySpace!MySpace      Facebook         Stumble      Get The Walrus on your Blackberry or Windows Mobile        RSS



Bearding the Lion
At the outset of “3D Vision” (July/ August), I thought that authors Taylor Owen and Patrick Travers were going to address the question of why we are in Afghanistan. But as in virtually every commentary on the war, they skirted the issue.

I believe that Canada is in Afghanistan because Chrétien, Martin, and Harper didn’t want to upset Mr. Bush when “we the people” wouldn’t tolerate joining the rape of Iraq. But this war is likely to be as great a disaster. When the ussr invaded Afghanistan from right next door, they lost almost 15,000 of their soldiers, another 50,000 plus were seriously wounded, and they still got run out of town.

Our leaders have undermined the work of Lester “Mike” Pearson, who shared his vision for Canada with a group of us who had the honour to work with him briefly after he left office: a small but great nation putting an end to war by standing between belligerents. Our three most recent crusader-leaders have massively wounded our military’s reputation for decades, if not forever.

John Olsen
Errington, British Columbia


As a Canadian Forces soldier with two tours in Afghanistan under my belt, I have front line experience with Canada’s 3D (defence, diplomacy, and development) policy.

In the fall of 2005 — the beginning of my second tour — Paul Martin sent a small group of us to take over the American Provincial Reconstruction Team camp inside Kandahar city. The goal was to help move the Canadian contingent from Kabul in the north to the volatile southern regions. The dangers were well-known, and many of our families were told we wouldn’t come home.

We walked the streets of Panjawai carrying out 3D. We didn’t build wells or schools, but we did help Afghans build infrastructure themselves. We earned the trust of the people as well as the respect of tribesmen, who understand talk of peace at the end of a rifle.

When diplomat Glyn Berry was killed by a suicide bomber on his way to a reconstruction site in early 2006 (I was injured in the same attack), it was definitely a turning point. It showed us that we were vulnerable, a target to be engaged. Canadian policy shifted slightly in that defence became our first priority. But the 3D approach allows for this; it is, in a sense, part of the plan. And troops continue to have the support of the people.

However, the future of Afghanistan really lies with three institutions: the Afghan government, the country’s police and judicial systems, and its army. The army is fiercely proud and already effective — with greater numbers, it will do well. Law and order will take longer to professionalize due to corruption and the lack of popular support. The government will succeed when President Karzai weakens the warlords’ hold on the country’s parliament.

    Cancel

The Walrus E-Newsletter

Online exclusives, events, offers:
get news of everything Walrus.


Search the Walrus

Article Tools

»    RSS Feed      Bookmark and Share

»  Printer-friendly page

»  Email this article

»  Comment on this article

»  More in this issue

»  More in Letters

»  More from The Walrus Readers

»  BUY THIS ISSUE

Buy a Cover Print, Get a Free Subscription or Renewal!