As the American empire experienced its comeuppance in the jungles of Southeast Asia, American professional football was coming into its own, taking over television, magazine covers, and the national consciousness. The nfl was a metaphor festival on cleats, and the first metaphor out of everyone’s mouth was that it was America’s game, America incarnate: knock the other guy on his ass and take his land. Underlying that was the more primal metaphor: war. The game was so perceived as America’s sublimation of war that novelist Don DeLillo took on the culture of football in his early-1970s novel, End Zone. His protagonist studied nuclear megadeath as he played college ball on scholarship. As one professor said, “I reject the notion of football as warfare. Warfare is warfare. We don’t need substitutes because we’ve got the real thing.”
Only America didn’t have the real thing. Vietnam — the war being fought and ending as the nfl rose to dominate American sports consciousness — offered no component of knocking the other guy on his ass and taking his land. The war for which the nfl was a metaphor was the only war America dreamed about or trained for, a showdown with the Russians on the plains of Europe, tank on tank, grunt on grunt. In that longed-for war, you could actually see a guy to knock down, and that guy had land you could actually take. It would be just like football.
The barbarity, the carnage of pro football, is so addictive on your TV because it was perfectly scaled to fit there, courtesy of PR genius Pete Rozelle, the nfl commissioner who built the game through an iron-fisted branding strategy. One of Rozelle’s strongest legacies was sizing the coverage to the parameters of a TV screen and making the networks do it his way. You couldn’t disconnect from an nfl game if you were on heroin. The camera is in a better position than all but the very best seats, and when it’s time for action there are few fans visible: it’s just you and your game. Yet watching a game is not unlike being on heroin. The action passes by in a haze, moments are undifferentiated, a narcotic gloss seems to lie between you and the onscreen experience.
The league, recognizing that a younger generation suffers from a kind of ennui, has now hung cameras on wires that traverse the game at swooping angles. The shots offer initial excitement, but after a few games it becomes clear that the nfl severely limits the use of its one cool technology. The overhead wire-flying camera only shoots from angles that perfectly mimic the composition of the nfl video games. The league has so little faith in its own product it deliberately presents the reality of football as equal to an artificial, fan-manipulated fantasy.
We watch football, however narcotized, mostly for three reasons: the beauty and grace of the long pass and reception, the thrill of seeing a well-paid genetic freak get his brains knocked out, and to visit or witness a final frontier, which was just being revealed to a broader America as the nfl broke large. It is a frontier so seductive and esoteric that when Don DeLillo sought to capture it he wrote about “the mystery of black speed.” African-American receivers of extraordinary grace and strength were bringing the long ball to the game by blazing past white defensive backs as if they were standing still. Speed seemed to be a talent no white player, no matter how hard he worked, could match. It seemed a gift from the gods, like physical beauty. Of course, the black speed demons worked their asses off to be fast, but in its first appearance, and in the colonial language used by sportscasters and the league to describe it, that speed was not presented as earned in the grind of weightlifting and running stadium stairs. DeLillo captured the awe and reverence pure speed could induce: “But mostly [a black running back] could fly . . . Speed is the last excitement left, the one thing we haven’t used up, still naked in its potential, the mysterious black gift that thrills the millions.”
O. J. Simpson proved the most easily digestible icon of black speed — the least threatening to a white mainstream. His enormous face alight, O. J. moved with a magical grace. His acceleration from a dead stop seemed barely human, and he slipped past defenders as if they were ghosts. Unlike Jim Brown, the nfl’s first angry, unrepentant black god, O. J. smiled every time he knocked someone on his ass. And, unlike Brown, O. J. did not seek to cream anybody; he would rather evade, rather dance, rather elide than initiate collision. His team’s management colluded in the spectacle. They almost never fielded a team around O. J. that could win. Instead they built an offence that encouraged him to shine regardless of the outcome of the game. O. J. was a black yuppie, using his skills to move up as he consistently tried to prove he never really meant to hurt anybody. He became a sideshow, a kind of minstrel act: a smiling, contented, unthreatening black Superman, happy to show off, make pals, and never taste victory.
The nfl marketers had need of a minstrel show, a black yuppie, because, along with blazing black speed, post-Vietnam the nfl saw black anger surface with a sanction it had in no other sport, because the nfl thrives on anger, masochism, and the will to hurt.
Psycho star safety Jack Tatum of the Oakland Raiders embodied a new black street presence — the man home from Vietnam and from the civil rights movement who, in the lyrics of Townes Van Zandt, wore his attitude “outside his pants, for all the honest world to feel.” Tatum was the embodiment of the Black Panthers: snaggle-toothed, with a scraggly, outrageous Afro and heavy-lidded mack-daddy eyes.








Comments (5 comments)
Rich Gelder: For a guy who seemingly knows nothing about football, he sure takes alot of the enjoyment out of it.
Suppression of black expression? Give me a break!
And he's dead wrong about the whole speed thing. The reality is that speed, for the most part, is neither a gift from the Gods, nor from working one's ass off either on stairs, but rather a bequeath from genetics. Sorry to offend the politically correct types who are nodding in agreement with every word Mr. Meyer has to say.
Like Howard Cosell before him, he seems to have never played the game either. January 29, 2008 19:51 EST
Geoff Wozniak: This reads like conspiracy theory nonsense. I'm not sure what the thesis is. Individualism is punished? Of course it is in a team sport. Like Rich suggested, perhaps experience playing a team sport would change that opinion. February 03, 2008 09:00 EST
Byron LeClair: Nonsense. I suggest that racism is not hidden by the league, because it does not exist. How many black/white tandems do you need to see before you question the basic supposition of this essay.
I think individual expression (black or white), including attitudes of racism are lost to tribalism, and that the need to belong to "the team" squelches even the most repugnant examples of individual expression (racism).
As for violence. This is a matter of perception. One man's violence is another man's glory. February 07, 2008 12:35 EST
Rob Harvie: While interesting metaphores abound, and the article is very well written, it falls apart in terms of it's underlying premise - that professional football has eroded it's essential "honesty" by removing from public view it's most central appeal - violence and individualism - larglely at the expense of black athletes.
In point of fact, to begin with, the least popular of the three major sports is basketball - which most cleally continues to exemplify selfish individualism, and, coincidentally, most clearly allows for free expression of black cultural experience. The game has evolved into a never-ending dunk-fest, which, to many, has become tedious.
Clearly the poster children of the NBA have been the likes of Shaquille O'Neal and LeBron James.. however, even the NBA seems to see the beauty and appreciation more sophisticated fans are developing for those who put team before self, witnessing Steve Nash and his success of late.
The NFL has changed, because society is changing.. and contrary to implication, it is not a reaction against the black athlete, it's a reaction against the concept of self ahead of team.. Like no other sport, football relies upon the cohesion of many parts. LeBron can carry the Cavaliers, however, as we clearly saw, Tom Brady can do nothing without a functional offensive line.
If we can ignore color for a moment.. who would you rather have as your leader on a team, or as a mentor to your impressionable child - Tom Brady, or Michael Vick? February 08, 2008 15:33 EST
Scooter: In reading the author's paragraph on bodybuilding's futility etc., I was reminded of reading old Doors' lyrics by Jim Morrison: They sound very high brow and hard to analyze making you think that maybe they have some deep meaning, until you realize that they are simply nonsense. April 02, 2008 07:38 EST