Dear Editor,
This article is deeply disturbing to me, a person who has just spent several weeks working and living in the Ngorongoro Conservation Area with the Maasai community living in the area. I will also be returning over the next indefinite period of time to continue with research and to work with a local hospital that primarily treats and cares for the Maasai community.
I am a PhD student with the University of Calgary that is working on developing community-based prevention and education programs that address mother-to-child HIV transmission in the Maasai population. Alanna Mitchell clearly did not educate herself properly about the Maasai community in Northern Tanzania prior to visiting. She not only has spelled their name wrong (with only one "A"), but she has also failed to survey the Maasai communities in the surrounding areas regarding HIV/AIDS statistics, testing and care and treatment. She has made the fatal mistake of relying on the knowledge on only a few people in one community, where the Maasai do not even reside. Rather than accurately and effectively seeking out information from local hospitals that work with Maasai communities on a regular basis, such as Endulen Hospital in the Ngorongoro Conservation Area, she has simply shown up in one area where there is a relatively low population of Maasai residing and has not even attempted to learn about the culture beyond tourism and HIV.
I fear that such an uninformed article will only serve to exacerbate stigma about HIV/AIDS in the area, as well as to create an ill-informed group of potential visitors that will view the Maasai community in Northern Tanzania as an HIV-ridden society that does nothing but engage in female circumcision and sexual rituals. This view does not accurately portray the Maasai culture at all. They are an intelligent group of people that have fought very hard to maintain their cultural traditions and pastoralist lifestyle in spite of government efforts to move them out of their native habitat. They are a kind people, that need assistance with food security, health care and HIV/AIDS prevention, testing and treatment. If Alanna Mitchell had not generalized an unconfirmed/unverified statistic that HIV prevalence among the Maasai in Tanzania is at 14%, she would have discovered that actually the prevalence is closer to an approximate 2.5% currently.
While I am an avid reader of the Walrus, I cannot support such a politicized and incorrect piece of writing and I am disappointed with the education and research that this author clearly did NOT do. In addition, the nice final paragraph about her $170/night hotel room in Zanibar did nothing except to serve as a reminder of the all too common view that the "Western" person is able to fly in and out of a place and assess a situation accurately without taking into account disparities of wealth, inequalities, gender issues, accessibility issues, geographical issues, etc. I would hope that most readers will be able to see this article as a discriminatory and judgmental piece that falsely portrays the Maasai people of Tanzania.
Sincerely,
Lauren Birks
i think a good writter has got to be well informed before writting any topic.
the maasai peopple and their values should be respected like any other people in the world.
i think no manipulation or violation of peoples culture and values is accepted antwhere in the world.
I whole-heartedly agree with Lauren Birks that the author should have been more informed before writing this piece.
I am a Canadian citizen and I am married to a Tanzanian man I met while living in Tanzania 2 years ago. Even 2 years after being married I still consider myself to be far from an expert on Tanzanian culture and society. I think that there are a lot of assumptions built into this article, which perpetuate stereotypes. From what I know about Tanzania there are a number of mistruths in the article.
I am not at all surprised. In my experience western people often see what they wan to see when they are in Africa and come home first hand accounts of how their stereotypes were confirmed.
While there are maasai people who dress traditionally, I find her account of being met by maasai women in maasai jewellery selling their crafts, humorous. I have often seen “maasai people” dressed in traditional outfits having diner with delighted tourists only to see them at the bar later or walking down the street on their day off in a pair of jeans and a t-shirt.
I am greatly discouraged by the fact that people continue to view peoples of other countries as primitive and feel the need to pose with them to have photos taken as if they are some kind of cultural artefact rather than real human beings.
Having read Ms. Mitchell's article twice now, I find the previous comments both petty and unreasonable.
"Masai" is the commonly used English name for this tribe, as a quick search of the WEB can readily determine. Its use no more indicates ignorance or faulty research than saying "Peking Duck".
As for Ms. Birks' more substantial criticisms of faulty statistics and sampling - these should be directed not at the writer, but rather at her informants, Dr. A.S. Swai, "the former medical health officer for the Monduli district", Charles Luoga of the Institute of Cultural Affairs, and Sara Lomayani of the Mto wa Mbu health centre, all of whom, if we're to believe Ms Birks' comments, are fools or liars, or both.
I choose to accept Ms Mitchell's account as credible, informative, and well worth reading. And I hope she will not be dissuaded from future reporting by these nit-picking naysayers.
My only complaint is that the details of the hut renovations and their acceptance in the community are somewhat murky.
We're told that eventually 150 huts were renovated in Selele, a "village of 2,400", but not how many Masai huts there were in this village.
I'm also curious as to how any mud hut with (presumably) an earthen floor and barely enough household water for consumption could ever be "immaculate", as the writer describes the home of Happiness Lemuriet, the matress-rich matriach.
The article states:
"Many Masai girls become sexually active when they are just seven or eight years old, so it’s possible some will become infected and die before they can bear their own children."
Please do not refer to this as "becoming sexually active". This is called "the rape of children". There is NO excuse for this. Evil!!!