The Lynching of Louie Sam

In 1884, an American mob brought frontier justice to the Canadian border.
The first wave came in the form of 30,000 American gold seekers who poured across the border starting in 1858. The Sto:lo called these people Xwelitem (“the starving ones”), likely because the Hudson’s Bay Company was trading with them for massive amounts of fish for export, and they didn’t understand who could possibly be eating it all. Settlers soon followed, and the arrival of the Northern Pacific and Canadian Pacific railways ushered in a third wave. Between 1880 and 1890, the population of Washington increased nearly fivefold. All of this put pressure on local native populations, creating an atmospheric gumbo of opportunity and resentment.

This was the environment Louie Sam was raised in, and his father, a man known to local whites as Mesachie (“bad” in Chinook trading jargon) Jim, was one sign of the times. Jim Sam was already suspected of murdering an aggressive and unpopular American settler who went missing in 1882 when he was sentenced to five years in provincial prison for shooting cattle. Killing settlers and cattle implies a wish to be rid of both, but any stated motive (or proof ) has been lost. Jim Sam died in prison in 1885, from tuberculosis. If newspaper accounts of the day are to be believed, Louie had a terrible reputation, not least because of his association with his father. The family lived in poverty, travelling between native communities on either side of the line. Louie’s most valuable possession would have been a Hudson’s Bay trade musket that may well have belonged to his father.

The border region at this place and time was sparsely populated, and the border itself barely acknowledged. People crossed in both directions, often and without interference. For local natives like Louie Sam, the border was irrelevant; their historic lands straddled the line, and their relatives lived on both sides (the Sto:lo’s southern counterparts are now known as the Nooksack). As a result, travel and seasonal migrations for work were commonplace into the 1970s. Even today, there is no fence, nor scarcely any other indication that the Sto:lo’s homeland is perched on the rim of the world’s most feared and fearful nation.

It was on the American side of this imaginary line that a fifty-eight-year old shopkeeper named James Bell was found supine on the floor of his burning home, shot through the back of the head. It was Sunday, February 24, 1884, and three boys returning home from church had seen the smoke and found the body. A homesteader named Breckenridge, from the nearby settlement of Nooksack, claimed to have seen Sam “one mile from James Bell’s” about an hour before the murder. A fifteen year-old boy claimed to have seen him afterward as well, recalling later that “the look on the Indian’s face as he approached me struck me with terror.”

That was all it took: the local sheriff, Stuart Leckie, was notified, and three days later, on Wednesday the twenty-seventh, he and Breckenridge crossed the border in search of William Campbell, a provincial justice of the peace. Campbell, a local man, took the Americans at their word, likely mounting his mule and riding immediately to Kilgard, where he knew he would find Louie Sam. Once there, Campbell charged Sam and handcuffed him on the spot. Thus, a foreign national, and a minor to boot, became the sole suspect and defendant in the case of US Authorities v. Louie Sam. Sheriff Leckie, who some said was present for the arrest, wanted to extradite Sam immediately, but Campbell forbade it; the youth would have his day in a Canadian court first.

Sometime that same afternoon, approximately seventy-five men departed Nooksack on foot and horseback, bound for the Canadian border, about ten kilometres away. They had just buried their neighbour, James Bell, and the image of Bell’s ten-year-old son riding to the graveyard on his murdered father’s coffin would have been fresh in their minds. Until now, this group had resembled the typical inhabitants of any northwestern settlers’ community. Among them were homesteaders and shopkeepers — by and large churchgoing men. But on this dark winter afternoon, they were transformed: a number of the men were clothed in their wives’ skirts; others wore their coats inside out. They had blackened their faces and bound rags around their heads; some had painted red lines across their eyes, “Injun” style.

Lynching wasn’t all that common in the American Northwest, so it is interesting to note that the members of this group seemed to know exactly what they were doing and went to some pains to disguise themselves. These men, who came to be known as the Nooksack Vigilance Committee, were armed with buffalo guns, pistols, and a length of hemp rope. Shortly after nightfall, they crossed into British Columbia at a place called Sumas Prairie, due south of Kilgard.

As the mass of men and horses moved north in the moonless dark, their masked features would have been further obscured by silver clouds of their own breath. Somewhere near the border, they met a man on the road heading south. This man was almost certainly Sheriff Leckie.

What is puzzling about these events is their apparent coordination at both ends. After arresting Louie Sam, Camp- bell, the JP, had put him in the hands of two hastily deputized constables: Thomas York, a well-established resident of Sumas Prairie; and Joe Steele who, interestingly, made his home on the American side of the border. The two men were given instructions to escort the handcuffed Sam to the jail at New Westminster, more than fifty kilometres away. Because of the length of the journey, Campbell told them to hold Sam at York’s house for the night and start for New Westminster in the morning. It was at this point that a routine prisoner transfer started looking like a barroom collaboration between Agatha Christie and Louis L’Amour.

The York house was one of the few proper homes in the area. It lay less than a kilometre north of the border, and it was a popular place. Offering travellers a meal or several nights’ lodging was common in those days — even the murder victim, James Bell, routinely fed passersby — and on the night of Louie Sam’s visit, the Yorks had a houseful. In addition to Mr. and Mrs. York and their employees, Owen Hughes and Dick Williams, there was Special Constable Steele, Louie Sam, and two other unnamed men, one of whom was described in court records only as a “traveller” and the other simply as a “stranger.” The Traveller was “a big man with black whiskers” who carried with him only a bedroll. The Stranger arrived with no blankets at all, just a gun.

PreviousPage 2 of 7Next
8 comment(s)

AnonymousNovember 11, 2008 19:57 EST

I'm wondering where more information can be found about lynching and disguise—I'm thinking particularly of the passage which describes the mob as dressed in women's skirts and head coverings. Does anyone know where I can find information on lynching and cross-dressing? Feedback appreciated.

Lawrence HutchinsonNovember 30, 2008 22:08 EST

"The Lynching of Louie Sam" (December 2008), is presented under the heading "History", but Mr. Vallant clearly has a political axe to grind. He presents these events in the context of 19th century frontier justice and the contrast in how it was administered north and south of the 49th parallel. Any pretext of historical objectivity is tarnished by blatant 21st century anti-American bias. The judicial system of the United States is said to involve "death as a byproduct". The invasion of Iraq is seen as "simply an extension of tradition". When compared "through the lens of mob justice" Canada is said to have been "raised by stable if somewhat overbearing parents, while the States ran away with the Lord of the Flies".

Mr. Vaillant mentions in passing the Canadian residential school issue. This is the tip of the iceberg of Canadian aboriginal abuse and degredation and it is but one of several historical events that modern-day Canadians have revisted with regret and sorrow.

No one can credibly argue that the story of lynching is anything but a shameful blot on the American conscience. But to refer to the United States as "the world's most feared and fearful nation" is surely overstating the case. Even worse, such shrill rhetoric obscures the search for balance and truth which should be the goal of historical enlightenment.

EliseJune 16, 2009 17:05 EST

I, too, would be very interested in seeing anything FACTUAL, perhaps a report, discussing the men being clad in womens clothing.

Kathy JamesJanuary 01, 2010 22:33 EST

There is articles in the archives of Ottawa on the men dressed in womens clothing and painting themselves with ocre. They had done this so as to not be recognized as men and not look like a threat when they went to the constables home to take Louie Sam,to hang him. They is correspondence from the undercover Mounted Police Constable and his friend who went to Nooksack and stayed and worked in the community inquiring into what had happened. You will find all the FACTUAL information there.

If you watch the Documentary, The Lynching Of Louie Sam from Wild Zone Films Ltd. 2004, you will see the actual documentations that they photographed for the film. The film reflects discussion on the year 1884 and the film year 2004 on how things have changed or not for the 1st Nations people with authorative figures in society. To reflect on both their legacy and their lingering impact on Sto:lo communities today. It tells a powerful story of racism, international politics, murder and cover-up in Canada and the USA at the end of the 19th century. A war almost ensued from this tragedy of guilty men coming across the border to hang an innocent native boy. The man who organized the lynching party was the guilty person who had killed the shop keeper and set the shop on fire.

In the community to which the young man came from,their has been numerous suicides at the hanging tree.....

Again I encourage you to look in the archives for more on the men dressed in womens clothing but also in Chilliwack, BC at the Sto:lo Nation Tribal Archives (Coqualeetza, the old indian TB hospital grounds)

How do I know anything on the subject? I live in the Sto:lo territory and my son played Louie Sam in the documentary.

Since this documentary aired there has been apoligies from the USA Political Leaders for the injustice that was caused.

sportJanuary 16, 2010 05:32 EST

The Lynching of Louie Sam - read this article in the magazine.

Female BodybuildingJanuary 24, 2010 10:04 EST

I never heard of this story before today. I must say that it is always very interesting to read nations histories even though they are a bit more dark in some ways maybe..

AnonymousNovember 24, 2010 19:13 EST

I am interested in watching the 2004 documentarty that was made. If anyone has any idea where I could find a copy of this it would be greatly appreciated. My nephews and myself loved being in the documentary, were all promised a copy and never recieved one. I would love to find the original and give them each a copy. This is a sad and profound moment in history and Louie Sam was, oh so young to have died such a horrific, alone and undeserved death. I cannot even imagine how his last moments of sheer terror must have been for this young child or what his family and freinds went through. If anyone can let me know how to get in touch with someone to give me direction to be able to watch this with the children, this would be greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance, Nikki Ann Lingenfelter and the children who were actors and extras on this documentary.

AnonymousNovember 24, 2010 19:13 EST

The children and myself would appreciate the opportunity to view the full length documentary that we all were cast as actor and extras in. If anyone has any information how to receive a copy please do tell. We were promised, but, never recieved the copies. Poor Louie Sam, his family and friends at such an awful, unjust and profound ending of such a young beautiful life. Thank you in advance, Nikki Ann Lingenfelter

Comment on this article
  
I agree to walrusmagazine.com’s comments policy.

Canada & its place in the world. Published by
the non-profit charitable Walrus Foundation
TwitterFacebookRSS
On newsstands now
New Issue on Sale
March 2012
Subscribe online for as little as $2.49 an issue. Visit The Walrus Store
to buy prints of our covers
The Walrus Laughs
Search the web, support the Walrus Foundation
COPA