The Walrus
Canada's Best Magazine

Renew your subscription
Customer Care
Support The Walrus Foundation
Sign up for our e-newsletter

Decomposting Bodies

What’s the greenest way to dispose of human remains?

by James Glave
Environment | From the July/Aug 2009 issue of The Walrus

Print Version   Share 

Audio: Listen to James Glave talk about promession and decomposting on New Hampshire Public Radio.Squirrels, it turns out, compost quite nicely. Small birds? Sure. Happens in the woods every day, after all. But stuff a human body into a backyard bin, and within a day or so the neighbours will start to complain.

Susanne Wiigh-Mäsak, a Swedish biologist specializing in soil production, explains: “When you die, you start smelling, because the oxygen does not reach inside the body.” More specifically, an abundance of anaerobic bacteria quickly takes hold in such a large mass of tissue, resulting in the rank gases CSI techs use to sniff out “decomp.” But after a decade spent investigating green options for dealing with dead bodies, Wiigh- Mäsak has finally figured out how to discreetly turn our earthly remains back into, well, earth.

The technique is called promession, the facilities that will do the job are called promatoriums, and the first one will open early next year in a converted crematorium in Jönköping, Sweden. Think of the operation as a kind of corpse disassembly line. The dearly departed are first supercooled in liquid nitrogen to about minus 196°C, then shattered into very small pieces on a vibration table. “We wanted to make the body unrecognizable without using any kind of an instrument that you would see in a kitchen or garage,” she explains.

Next a vacuum is used to evaporate moisture while a metal separator, traditionally used by the food processing industry to remove stray foreign objects from meat products, shuffles aside fillings, crowns, titanium hips, and so on. (You can put that sandwich down now.) Finally, the vaguely pink crumbs are deposited in a large box made of corn or potato starch.

Surviving family members bury the box in shallow topsoil and plant a tree or shrub on top. With the exception of perhaps a few broken remnants of plastic pacemaker, in a matter of months nothing is left but memories and some lush greenery.

Assuming all goes well for Promessa in Jönköping, Wiigh-Mäsak expects partners will soon hang out their shingles in eleven countries, including Australia, South Africa, Germany, Korea, the UK, and even — pending regulatory hurdles and a still-in-the-works licensing agreement — Canada. But are we ready for this sort of thing?

Mortuary customs are among the most deeply entrenched in any culture, and in these parts the standard is deep burial. A mortician replaces the body’s blood with embalming chemicals, then arranges the preserved cadaver inside a casket made of metal or lumber — sometimes redwood or a tropical species like mahogany. Post-funeral, workers lower the casket into an underground vault six feet below ground level and backfill the grave. There, once microbes consume all available oxygen, the corpse putrefies into toxic skeletal sludge. Up top, constant mowing, fertilizing, and irrigation keep everything looking tidy.

Alternatively, the body is burned in a natural gas, propane, or oil-fired furnace, releasing a cloud of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, along with the aerosolized mercury from a lifetime’s accumulation of dental fillings. An operator then pulverizes the bones left behind in a cremulator and presents these “ashes” to the bereaved in an urn.

Despite the undertaker’s soothing assurances, neither option is especially respectful of either the body or the ecosystem, which is why “natural burial” groups have started popping up all over Canada and the world. These organizations advocate burying the dead in less intensively landscaped settings, closer to the surface, without benefit of embalmment, a casket, or even a headstone.

Mention promession to even this crowd, however, and you turn up the conservative take. “There may be a little bit of an ‘ick’ factor,” fears Janet McCausland, executive director of the Toronto-based Natural Burial Association. “Natural burial is what we have been doing for millennia. People may be leery of this new fandangled technology.”

Home | Page 1 of 2 | Next
12 comment(s)

Janice RoseJuly 06, 2009 22:10 EST
Where do I sign up? I think this is a great option.


AnonymousJuly 08, 2009 08:41 EST
This is an interesting option for body disposal. Another concern with cremation is the tremendous amount of energy that is required to burn the body. How much energy is required to supercool the body and then pulverize it?


nikitafullmoonJuly 08, 2009 11:09 EST
Canada, eh? I guess I'll have to hang in till it's here.


SagitelleJuly 09, 2009 17:55 EST
I wish this were available in Canada. I'd like my body to disposed of in this way. I love trees and I've planted many trees on my property. It would be nice to know that I would be "giving back" to the earth in this manner after I die.


AdrianJuly 18, 2009 04:27 EST
One body per human composter, the body robed only in a compostible shroud, no "ashes"available but economical and less waste of scarce resources. It can come.


HeatherJuly 18, 2009 17:28 EST
The real reason behind the funeral industry is to provide an acceptable way of disposing of the human body.Some cultures cremate, others,allow the body to decompose without embalming. Embalming not necessary to bury someone, it is strictly for cosmetic reasons. I found the 'ick' factor increased as I read the description of the promession process.


nagaijinJuly 19, 2009 16:49 EST
You raised good points about the North American burial industry (I hesitate to use the word 'tradition')– you show that there's not an awful lot about it which is 'natural' any more, and the new promession technique is just as valid (and respectful) as any other modern method of desposing of the dead.

However–
"…turn up the conservative take."? That's an awkward, jargonish and imprecise phrase (do you mean conservative Christians? Traditionalists of other faiths are appalled by embalming or uncremated burial). It mars an otherwise well-written article.


sollyJuly 19, 2009 17:54 EST
Why does this article give me the irrisistible urge to dig out my DVD of "Soylent Green"?


AnnieAugust 02, 2009 11:34 EST
Not only is traditional burial not good for the environment, it's a waste of land resources... a waste of good real estate. This is a great solution to that problem as well.


KendraAugust 06, 2009 23:35 EST
I am changing my WILL! Thank goodness for people who are thinking "outside the box". As a child in Chicago, IL I used to be incensed at the enormous waste of green space for cemeteries, and for monolithic graveyard markers. (I can't think of the name for them right now!) I remember reading The American Way of Death by Jessica Mitford and realizing how hypnotized we are by funeral directors and the like. As for Promession, I AM curious about the environmental and financial impact of the nitrogen process, however.


political science papersNovember 02, 2009 00:46 EST
interesting technologies! thanks doctors and scientific!


??????????December 22, 2009 22:28 EST
Interesting technique, good for the environment too.


Comment on this article
       
I agree to walrusmagazine.com’s comments policy.
TwitterFacebookRSS
On newsstands now
New Issue on Sale
September 2010
Subscribe online for less than $2.98 an issue. Visit The Walrus Store to buy a print of the cover
The Walrus Blog