The Walrus Blog

What, me worry?
After days of anticipation, Robert Mugabe seems ever closer to losing his hold on the people of Zimbabwe. This is cause for celebration: under Mugabe, a once-rich country has been racked by inflation rates of 100,000 percent. The U.S. State Department declared 2007 the worst yet for human rights in Zimbabwe, citing political abductions, killings and torture by government security forces. By any standard, Mugabe’s was a regime that had to go.

(My Walrus blogging colleague Arno Kopecky agrees, with some great on-the-ground reporting in Zimbabwe.)

But Zimbabwe’s dilemma won’t end with the inauguration of a new president, whenever that day comes. Mugabe’s likely successor, Morgan Tsvangirai, will face two crucial decisions soon after taking office, and those decisions will test both his resolve and the country’s chances for success.

The first issue facing the new president will be dealing with the crimes committed by the state security services Mugabe’s watch. Tsvangirai will need to decide whether to prosecute those responsible for the abuses, or whether to institute some form of amnesty, possibly in conjunction with an official commission to sort through questions of responsibility, similar to the Truth, Justice and Reconciliation commission established in South Africa after Nelson Mandela took office.

Dealing with crimes committed under Mugabe will not be easy for Zimbabwe’s new president, who will face strong pressure from some quarters for a reckoning. The international community, and in particular the Commonwealth, no doubt eager to welcome Zimbabwe back into its fold, may urge a sort of negotiated amnesty, conscious of the risk of further division in the country. For the new president, the choice will not be easy.

Nor will the choice be easy for another pressing issue: what to do about Mugabe’s legacy of land reform. In September 2005, Mugabe’s government nationalized the country’s farmland, evicting the largely white landowners whose commercial farms had provided much of the country’s income. Those who took the land had little or no experience running farms. To make matters worse, Zimbabwe’s banks largely refused to provide the new farmers with loans, further limiting their chances of success.

From an economic standpoint, the best solution may be simply to reverse Mugabe’s land reforms, returning much of Zimbabwe’s farmland to those who owned it before the 2005 decree. But even in a country where Mugabe is deeply unpopular, pushing Zimbabweans off their new land may be politically impossible. Yet the new president will face strong pressure from Western countries to do so, especially Britain, to which most of the displaced farmers trace their roots.

If and when Tsvangirai finally takes office, there will be no shortage of accolades from the international community. But Zimbabwe’s challenges will not end with Mugabe’s departure. Countries that celebrate Zimbabwe’s change in government will need to follow with offers of assistance, on terms that Tsvangirai can live with.

Saturday’s election was a triumph for Zimbabwe. But the country may soon find that getting rid of Mugabe was the easy part.

Posted in Bright Lights

  • http://www.zimhomepage.com Innocent Matiyenga

    I agree with you,Zimbabwe faces many challenges after the demise of the Mugabe regime.
    .The immediate aspects we need to solve are inflation,fuel and food shortages.The country is rich in natural resources and we have so many investors who are holding their investments because of Mugabe.These will definately come in as soon as Mugabe leaves office.

    This will definately lead to quick recovery.

    So many changes need to be introduced ,most of these will be painful though

  • http://www.indymediakenya.org OSCAR ODHIAMBO

    I would wish to slightly differ with some of the opinions you reached with regards to president Mugabe’s departure as the sitting president. In as much as i would like to agree with you that the incumbent has brought Zimbabwe to some extent to where the country is today; with its inflation rates hitting an absurd rate of 100,000% – thereby leading to poor living standards of the masses and lack of basic necessities – there is need to also look at the international community and the imperial British power as being part of the indirect contributing factors that contributed to this countries current state.
    Zimbabwe being an autonomous country with right to its sovereignty grants upon its leaders the discretion to decide the trajectory that they deem is right for the country to follow. History can prove that this lands that President Mugabe chose to issue to the indigenous people of Zimbabwe are pieces of land that rightfully belonged to them until they they imperialist dispossessed them forcefully from them. If anything reasonable is to be contemplated then that should be the need for the incoming president opposition leader Tsvangirai and his official representatives – with the help of both foreign and local investors – to build the capacity of the local indigenous farmers so as to enable them take full charge of what is duly theirs.
    To ask but a simple question: Whose interest do the common wealth normally protect? Is it the common man or the filthy wealthy minority? This rhetoric ambassadors whose job has been to advocate for the oppressive regimes at the expense of the poor majority have no business in establishing what is good or not good in this regard.
    For those investors who want to invest in the new Zimbabwe they should invest with a real intent of improving the lives of the already over impoverished people of Zimbabwe. Its time for the white settlers to start conceding that they – by the virtue of accessing large expanses of arable land illegally during and after the colonial era did/have gone astray from the spirit of democratic co-existence. Therefore they should make reparations of whatever damage this acts of slavery inflicted in the livelihood of the masses – not only in Zimbabwe but to all Africans at home and abroad.
    In conclusion i would like to invoke upon the arbitrators who are to conduct the investigations as part of the truth, justice and reconciliation commission that is yet to be established – to sermon both the internal and external perpetrators who were in either way involved in making Zimbabwe and its people be in a current state that it is today to equally be held appear before the commission and be held accountable and forced to pay substantially for the wrongs committed. There should not be pockets of biasness allowed to permeate the inquiry.

  • rightsaidfred

    >>>>(by Oscar Odhiambo)History can prove that this lands that President Mugabe chose to issue to the indigenous people of Zimbabwe are pieces of land that rightfully belonged to them until they they imperialist dispossessed them forcefully from them.

    It is not that simple. This is not simple theft. The lands were turned into something far more productive, and all Zimbabwe benefited.

    >>>>…to build the capacity of the local indigenous farmers so as to enable them take full charge of what is duly theirs.

    I don’t believe this is an achievable goal in the present political situation. I’m not sure it would be achievable in any context by the central authorities.

    >>>>Whose interest do the common wealth normally protect? Is it the common man or the filthy wealthy minority?

    It is both. We benefit from the skills, work, and investments of the wealthy. They are not inherently evil.

    >>>>…should invest with a real intent of improving the lives of the already over impoverished people…

    Economies are a combination of altruism and self interest. Too much of one is not a good thing.

    >>>>Its time for the white settlers to start conceding that they – by the virtue of accessing large expanses of arable land illegally during and after the colonial era did/have gone astray from the spirit of democratic co-existence.

    White farmers payed absurd amounts of taxes, and acceded to extensive work rules. I have a different opinion as to who is undemocratic.

  • chris

    dude looks like Flavor Flave @ 80 years minus the clock


Canada & its place in the world. Published by
the non-profit charitable Walrus Foundation
TwitterFacebookRSS
On newsstands now
New Issue on Sale
March 2012
Subscribe online for as little as $2.49 an issue. Visit The Walrus Store
to buy prints of our covers
The Walrus Laughs
Search the web, support the Walrus Foundation
COPA
Recent Blog Comments

In Defence of the Confession

best seo forums: Thanks for sharing such an brilliant post. I make sure to visit this post regularly. keep sharing more and more..

Seenloitering: The “gender analysis” in this article is upside down. Marie Calloway is a threat to the status quo because she threatens the myth that women are morally superior, above...

Jefry: I do not really like to read a story like a novel or a real story but I think this is very interesting and need to be read

Big Trouble in Little Africa

Legong: I know I am replying to this pathetic, racist statement a little late and the whole ignorant rant probably doesn’t even deserve a reply. Wanhenglo, if we were all to generalise about...

Legong: I know I am replying to this pathetic, racist statement a little late and the whole ignorant rant probably doesn’t even deserve a reply. Wanhenglo, if we were all to generalise about...

We Are Potential

Sky Goodden: This is startling, refreshing, overdue, and damn good. Thank you, Shary.

Where’s the Love?

Mark: It’s not just in Canada, it seems all over artists don’t get the local recogtnition they should. I was in Malaga where Picasso was born and it is much different, but then he is...

The End of the Family Line

Guest: I didn’t want babies or a period any more.  I KNEW without a doubt I did not want children so I had been asking for a hysterectomy since I was 19.  I finally got it at 39.  My...

Cairo Chameleon

Djzklj: Pretty interesting article, despite that I don’t wanna make a voyage there

Craftwerk

Sanyo Seiki: I love this game! Very addicted! Sanyo Seiki

Archived Blog Posts
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007