The Walrus Blog

In what is surely one of the worst ideas in recent cinematic history, Warner Brothers has asked Guy Ritchie to direct a new Sherlock Holmes movie. Making it even worse? The script is to be based on a comic book, and both of these iterations are to focus, Variety tells us, on our hero’s physical side in an attempt “reinvent Holmes and sidekick Dr. John H. Watson.” According to information shared by Lionel Wigram, the film’s producer, the new Holmes will “be more adventuresome and take advantage of his skills as a boxer and swordsman.” The Guardian headline really says it all: “Guy Ritchie takes on ‘all-action’ Sherlock Holmes.” I like to think that those scare quotes are some British copy editor’s way of saying, “Hey, listen everybody: how dumb is this?!”

In effect, greenlighting this project is like saying that it would be really cool to make a movie about Hulk Hogan’s recent dalliance with modal logic. It’s not inconceivable that the Hulkamaniac is into the whole possible worlds thing, but it certainly isn’t his day job. The fact that Holmes is physically agile and has a history of boxing makes him a rounder character, but it doesn’t define that roundness; while I would find Hogan more interesting if he had some serious thoughts about David Lewis, I would never expect—nor would I want—it to be more essential to his character than, say, the time he body-slammed Andre the Giant while defending the world title at Wrestlemania III.

The last time I wrote about Holmes, my focus was on the brilliant new Penguin series of paperbacks. While thinking about the man in preparation for writing that, it occurred to me that the notion of order is central to the Holmes world. I didn’t mention it in the post, because it seemed sort of self-evident; the books and stories are based on the possibilities of reasoning, which is an inherently structural act. While Holmes may have distracting tendencies—his occasionally debilitating drug addiction, say—the idea of order is at the centre of his capabilities.

Which is why this news is particularly terrible. Setting aside the fact that the direction of the film stands in distinct opposition to any reasonable interpretation of what is essential to the character (and ignoring the fact that it’s a crass attempt to make a biceps-and-zingers superhero out of a character who is already a superhero, though of a different kind), the idea of Guy Ritchie helming this picture is ridiculous. Ritchie’s style—frantic, frenetic, jittery, annoying—is the antithesis of the masterly calm that defines Holmes’s personal world, and the precision with which Conan Doyle relates the events that happen within it.

But I suppose it’s all tied up in that word ‘reinvention’ To truly reinvent the character, it seems, they’ll need to change not only his fundamental nature, but the way he relates to what is fundamental to his world. So perhaps Guy Ritchie and his MTV editing team are exactly the right choice. Because if you’re going to kill an idol, you might as well make doubly sure he’s dead.

Tags, ,
Posted in The Shelf

  • Jeremy Keehn

    I suspect Holmes was getting highly irregular with those Irregulars.

  • http://wsherlockholmes.blogspot.com/ Jeremy

    I am not going to see that shit of movie. Guy Ritchie is the worst director I’ve ever seen.

  • Scott

    Good article! Guy Ritchie’s career is over.

  • Adam

    This really is bad news. You’re absolutely right to say that Holmes’ world is all about order and reason, and this movie sounds like it’s going to be horrendous. Why does Holmes need to be ‘reinvented’ anyway? He’s fine as he is. I only hope that the movie is slaughtered by the critics, just so that nobody actually takes Guy Ritchie’s interpretation of Holmes seriously.

    It’s a shame, really, because a new Holmes movie might actually have been nice.

  • http://www.chantelleoliver.com Chantelle Oliver

    No worries!! Sherlock will be saved!:

    According to a new report, Sacha Baron Cohen and Will Ferrell have signed on to do a Judd Apatow (Knocked Up, 40-year old Virgin) backed Sherlock Holmes movie.

    Take that Guy! Although, Madonna cast as Sherlock would be incredible.

  • http://www.vpscin.or Frank Connolly

    In seeking to re-invent what is already a classic, it will automatically cease to be so.

    Holmes is popular because of what he is, not from what some yuppy Hollywood producer trying to make a name for himself makes him.
    Just another example of the dumbing down of everything to cater for society’s lowest common denominators. (Why not put 50c into the title role and Paris Hilton as Dr Watson?)

    The comedic version will wipe the floor with this re-invention.

  • http://www.walrusmagazine.com/blogs/2008/07/04/friday-miscellany/ The Walrus Blogs » Friday Miscellany » The Shelf

    [...] another new Sherlock Holmes picture to complement the terribly conceived Guy Ritchie version that I wrote about a few weeks ago. This idea suffers from the same conceptual flaw—recasting a character by making [...]

  • http://www.walrusmagazine.com/blogs/2008/07/11/friday-books-miscellany-july-11/ The Walrus Blogs » Friday Books Miscellany: July 11 » The Shelf

    [...] really trying to stop talking about the upcoming Sherlock Holmes movies, which have been frequent topics of discussion here. But news continue to arrive, most lately this week’s revelation that Robert [...]

  • http://www.tomorrowmuseum.com/2008/11/29/tony-scott-to-make-the-warriors-lame/ Tomorrow Museum » Archive » Tony Scott to Make “The Warriors” Lame

    [...] Eli Roth a remake of Susperia. Was Guy Richie unavailable? (Oh, right, he’s off ruining Sherlock Holmes.) “You’ll still get the same story, but we’re reconstructing the family, [...]


Canada & its place in the world. Published by
the non-profit charitable Walrus Foundation
TwitterFacebookRSS
On newsstands now
New Issue on Sale
March 2012
Subscribe online for as little as $2.49 an issue. Visit The Walrus Store
to buy prints of our covers
The Walrus Laughs
Search the web, support the Walrus Foundation
COPA
Recent Blog Comments

Big Trouble in Little Africa

Legong: I know I am replying to this pathetic, racist statement a little late and the whole ignorant rant probably doesn’t even deserve a reply. Wanhenglo, if we were all to generalise about...

Legong: I know I am replying to this pathetic, racist statement a little late and the whole ignorant rant probably doesn’t even deserve a reply. Wanhenglo, if we were all to generalise about...

We Are Potential

Sky Goodden: This is startling, refreshing, overdue, and damn good. Thank you, Shary.

Where’s the Love?

Mark: It’s not just in Canada, it seems all over artists don’t get the local recogtnition they should. I was in Malaga where Picasso was born and it is much different, but then he is...

In Defence of the Confession

Seenloitering: The “gender analysis” in this article is upside down. Marie Calloway is a threat to the status quo because she threatens the myth that women are morally superior, above...

Jefry: I do not really like to read a story like a novel or a real story but I think this is very interesting and need to be read

The End of the Family Line

Guest: I didn’t want babies or a period any more.  I KNEW without a doubt I did not want children so I had been asking for a hysterectomy since I was 19.  I finally got it at 39.  My...

Cairo Chameleon

Djzklj: Pretty interesting article, despite that I don’t wanna make a voyage there

Craftwerk

Sanyo Seiki: I love this game! Very addicted! Sanyo Seiki

Unhinged From Realism

Anonymous: People are so disconnected from reality these days, it seems like the only thing that matters to them is materialism and celebrity gossip, disgusting! http://poemti.me

Archived Blog Posts
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007