<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Invisible Olympics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.walrusmagazine.com/blogs/2008/08/14/the-invisible-olympics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.walrusmagazine.com/blogs/2008/08/14/the-invisible-olympics/</link>
	<description>Fearless. Thoughtful. Witty. Canadian. And Opinionated.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 02:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rudolf</title>
		<link>http://www.walrusmagazine.com/blogs/2008/08/14/the-invisible-olympics/#comment-6699</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 23:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.walrusmagazine.com/blogs/?p=1113#comment-6699</guid>
		<description>@Smith The goal isn't free online TV. The goal is using the Internet to its fullest. The networks *want* more people to view their coverage of the games because more people are also viewing whatever advertisements they put up. Free TV is a by-product of accepting sponsorships and advertisements.

Why should the networks restrict themselves to particular geographical areas?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Smith The goal isn&#8217;t free online TV. The goal is using the Internet to its fullest. The networks *want* more people to view their coverage of the games because more people are also viewing whatever advertisements they put up. Free TV is a by-product of accepting sponsorships and advertisements.</p>
<p>Why should the networks restrict themselves to particular geographical areas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Davidson</title>
		<link>http://www.walrusmagazine.com/blogs/2008/08/14/the-invisible-olympics/#comment-6691</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 11:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.walrusmagazine.com/blogs/?p=1113#comment-6691</guid>
		<description>Joel:

Pretty frustrating.  My friend in Qatar is having the same problem...an Olympic shut-out from all avenues!

Ian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joel:</p>
<p>Pretty frustrating.  My friend in Qatar is having the same problem&#8230;an Olympic shut-out from all avenues!</p>
<p>Ian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.walrusmagazine.com/blogs/2008/08/14/the-invisible-olympics/#comment-6687</link>
		<dc:creator>Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 00:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.walrusmagazine.com/blogs/?p=1113#comment-6687</guid>
		<description>Hang on a minute.  You have TV coverage of the olympics available to you (possibly not of the greatest quality), but you're throwing a hissy fit because you can't watch the olympics on another network?  And this makes capitalism and communism equivalent?

I'm a bit dubious of the right to free online TV too.  Ok, it would be reasonable if it's a matter of national importance, but this is sports coverage.  If the networks give it to you for free then how do they pay their reporters?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hang on a minute.  You have TV coverage of the olympics available to you (possibly not of the greatest quality), but you&#8217;re throwing a hissy fit because you can&#8217;t watch the olympics on another network?  And this makes capitalism and communism equivalent?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a bit dubious of the right to free online TV too.  Ok, it would be reasonable if it&#8217;s a matter of national importance, but this is sports coverage.  If the networks give it to you for free then how do they pay their reporters?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kwame</title>
		<link>http://www.walrusmagazine.com/blogs/2008/08/14/the-invisible-olympics/#comment-6644</link>
		<dc:creator>Kwame</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 09:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.walrusmagazine.com/blogs/?p=1113#comment-6644</guid>
		<description>It's is compared to national borders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s is compared to national borders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Neal</title>
		<link>http://www.walrusmagazine.com/blogs/2008/08/14/the-invisible-olympics/#comment-6624</link>
		<dc:creator>William Neal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 03:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.walrusmagazine.com/blogs/?p=1113#comment-6624</guid>
		<description>You are so fracking correct. You go man. You go. I had such a conniption trying to get the Live Opening Ceremony...on my TV, here in the U.S. I could You Tube it I understand now, but so what? Frack that! I searched on the net and the appropriately named CCTV site played only stuff later, said that Live Coverage for people in China would be available. Ha, that is if they had electricity and or a TV. Right. And some how Bogota, Columbia had it on their TV, but requisite 10 second pause before receiving images. Duh. 
--William</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are so fracking correct. You go man. You go. I had such a conniption trying to get the Live Opening Ceremony&#8230;on my TV, here in the U.S. I could You Tube it I understand now, but so what? Frack that! I searched on the net and the appropriately named CCTV site played only stuff later, said that Live Coverage for people in China would be available. Ha, that is if they had electricity and or a TV. Right. And some how Bogota, Columbia had it on their TV, but requisite 10 second pause before receiving images. Duh.<br />
&#8211;William</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
