Skip to content
Walrus Blogs

The Invisible Olympics

August 14th, 2008 by Joel McConvey in World Famous in Korea | Viewed 10319 times since 04/15, 28 so far today

[Post to Twitter] Tweet This                   digg        FB          RSS

The Olympics are a cesspool of hypocrisy and cold, slimy greed

JEJU-DO, SOUTH KOREA—I’ve read that the Olympics are producing some thrilling moments this year. I wouldn’t know.

During the lead up to the Games, when China blocked journalists from accessing websites such as Amnesty International and the BBC, there was a huge media kerfuffle about broken promises and the absolute need for a climate in which reporting could be done freely and without restriction. The Olympics, the argument went, are about cultural exchange and openness, and limiting access was hostile to the very spirit of the Games.

Yet here I sit in Korea, five days into the Olympic media orgy, and if I want to watch an event or a feature from my home country—because let’s not be naive: the Olympics are also very much about nationalism—I’m shit out of luck. Every attempt I’ve made to access Olympic content on an international website has been a failure, and in general, my quest for online Olympic coverage has been by far the most strangled Internet experience of my life. Not since the sweaty-palmed days of my Catholic school dances have I been so thoroughly denied.

That’s because networks in every country have paid obscene amounts of money for Olympic rights in their territory, and no one is allowed to step over anyone’s virtual boundaries to siphon ratings away from the winners. As such, when I try to watch any of the dozens of Olympic videos that CBC has paid millions of dollars to bring to Canadians (not that there are many compelling reasons for us to watch yet), I get a little blue screen saying

SORRY, THIS VIDEO IS NOT AVAILABLE IN YOUR AREA.

The BBC tells me something the same thing. NBC, which paid $900 million for rights to the games in the U.S., is, in true American style, more blunt: “We’re Sorry. [BTW: No you’re not.] NBC is required to restrict this video to viewers within the United States.” The closest thing I’ve gotten to Olympic coverage are the Al-Jazeera video featurettes about ticket fraud and Beijing opera posted on YouTube.

I’m sure if I tried hard enough, I could find a way to wriggle around these firewalls. Besides which, if I’m desperate for Olympics coverage, I can always watch one of the three networks covering the Games in South Korea (MBC, SBS and KBS)—where monopolistic coverage isn’t scheduled to come into effect until 2010 — replay Park Tae-hwan’s gold medal performance in swimming over and over and over and over again until I go batshit insane and start dumping pots of kimchi into the swimming pool at the Ramada in a gesture of crazed patriotism. (See video above.)

In reality, what I’m probably going to do is fully, once and for all write off the Olympics, which claim to be such a beacon of hope and purity in the world, as a cesspool of corruption, hypocrisy and cold, slimy greed.

There may be a great deal of difference in the motives that the Chinese government and the major broadcast networks have for restricting access, and it’s certainly true that the content they’re controlling is different. However, the fundamental result is the same: I want to find information or images online, and I cannot, because someone has decided that my accessing those images or information will upset the status quo, threaten the reach and bankbooks of those in control and open cracks in their fortress walls that will surely, in their eyes, turn into chasms. Someone has seen fit to drive a flag into the virtual skin of cyberspace, thereby declaring it their territory and their property, to be managed and branded as they see fit. Consider this quote from Scott Moore, executive director of CBC Sports, on whether or not the networks would be able to broadcast from Tiananmen Square—typically a pretty tightly-managed area of Beijing:

“As rights-holders, we impressed upon the organizing committee that we’re not there necessarily to embarrass anybody, but we felt very strongly, whatever happens at the Games, we have not only rights that we’ve paid for, but a right as journalists to cover that.”

Piss on your authoritarian grip on the media; I paid my money!

Don’t get me wrong. I realize that if someone pays a kazillion dollars for something, they expect to be treated accordingly. But I just hope the irony doesn’t escape anyone: Communism and capitalism both have their great walls—they just build them from different stuff.

More in World Famous in Korea | Email Joel McConvey <-->| Blogs Home | Current Issue | SUBSCRIBE »

Posted on Thursday, August 14th, 2008 at 11:41 am. Follow comments through the RSS 2.0 feed. Comment or trackback.

5 Responses to “The Invisible Olympics”

  1. William Neal Says:

    You are so fracking correct. You go man. You go. I had such a conniption trying to get the Live Opening Ceremony…on my TV, here in the U.S. I could You Tube it I understand now, but so what? Frack that! I searched on the net and the appropriately named CCTV site played only stuff later, said that Live Coverage for people in China would be available. Ha, that is if they had electricity and or a TV. Right. And some how Bogota, Columbia had it on their TV, but requisite 10 second pause before receiving images. Duh.
    –William

  2. Kwame Says:

    It’s is compared to national borders.

  3. Smith Says:

    Hang on a minute. You have TV coverage of the olympics available to you (possibly not of the greatest quality), but you’re throwing a hissy fit because you can’t watch the olympics on another network? And this makes capitalism and communism equivalent?

    I’m a bit dubious of the right to free online TV too. Ok, it would be reasonable if it’s a matter of national importance, but this is sports coverage. If the networks give it to you for free then how do they pay their reporters?

  4. Ian Davidson Says:

    Joel:

    Pretty frustrating. My friend in Qatar is having the same problem…an Olympic shut-out from all avenues!

    Ian

  5. Rudolf Says:

    @Smith The goal isn’t free online TV. The goal is using the Internet to its fullest. The networks *want* more people to view their coverage of the games because more people are also viewing whatever advertisements they put up. Free TV is a by-product of accepting sponsorships and advertisements.

    Why should the networks restrict themselves to particular geographical areas?

Leave a Reply

Neither the author nor The Walrus necessarily agree with the comments below. Editors will not correct spelling or grammar. The Walrus reserves the right to edit or delete comments entirely.

GET THE WALRUS NEWSLETTER


 

WALRUS BLOGGERS