The best thing about Chrome is that it is fast. The fastest. Evar. How so? To put it simply, the way it treats different tabs in the browser is the way your operating system treats different open applications. Each one runs independently, so the power of your computer—via its dual processors for example—can be divided and used for what God made processors for: speed. And, if you experience a crash on one pesky web page, the whole browser doesn’t have to be closed. You can just close the one hung tab. So, Chrome does for browsing what the Mac OS did for mainstream operating systems.
Think of your Chrome browser pages as application windows. They are nothing like your Firefox, Safari or Internet Explorer (Internet Explorer? really? still?) browser pages. That equals stability and speed.
There are lots of other good (and somewhat boring) things I could write about Chrome. But none of them matter, because when it comes to using computers speed trumps everything. I close and never use applications that run slow. And then I delete them.
Firefox is painfully slow compared to Chrome. If that doesn’t change soon, Firefox will bleed users and slowly become obsolete. It’s like the Blackberry versus the iPhone. Crackberry has a keyboard that is actually useful, but it is so much slower than the iPhone and so is in big trouble.
It is more likely that Windows will change its operating system to compete with Chrome—it’s not really a browser issue per se. Chrome reorganizes how we think about browsers versus operating systems, just like Google redefined knowledge. Again, it is about speed. With a fast, reliable browser, cloud computing becomes obvious. That means even hardware will change. The MacAir makes more sense suddenly. The separation between desktop and browser, online and offline, is beginning to dissolve.
Does this prove Google is an evil monster that is taking over the universe not just of browsers but now operating systems? Well, Chrome is built on open source architecture. So once again Google is not selling anything in the out-dated way of explicit and direct product creation and sale. Its mantle of goodness, contained within their unofficial motto of “Do no evil”, remains in place. This is perhaps the most significant feat, at least in a cultural sense. Page and Brin (Google’s daddies) can keep posing around like a couple of affable kids who just stumble into a few billion dollars every year, their Masters of the Universe secret identities intact.
This is because they have set up the perfect win-win situation: If Firefox and Windows improve access and speed across the Internet, Google wins even if Chrome loses the “browser wars.” Chrome is as much about upping the ante and pushing access and useability up, so that more pageviews and ads can hit our eyes and fill Google databases and coffers. So use Chrome, use the soon-to-be sped-up Firefox and revolutionized Windows or any other operating system that has been Chromed into improving access—and Google still comes out ahead.
In other words, win or lose against Firefox et al, the release and speed of Chrome translates into the perfect glory-filled victory for Google.
vodkasoda For avid browsers like myself, Google Chrome is FTW (for the win in internet parlance) particularly because of the speed of the browser. I’ve been reading the geek reviews and such and there are many valid criticisms, but most revolve around either the lack of add-ons (which will no doubt be forthcoming) and the trouble with flash animation. We must remember that this browser is still in BETA mode.
One interesting piece of insight I came across was the suggestion that by issuing this software as open source, google is in essence issuing a challenge to browser developers to pick up their game by checking out the code so that their next versions can create a platform for google apps to work properly. At present there is a gap between what browsers can handle and what google apps can deliver.
Now, if Chrome is Groucho, Firefox is Chico, and IE is Harpo, what then is Zeppo?
Pat Tanzola Zeppo = Navigator (rarely seen and talked about, but mythical in its way)
A female Marx Brothers fan? I might have to get down on one knee and propose :)
As for Google Chrome, I’m still using it even though it took a bit of time for the page to load with your Chantelle vs. Man(bridge) clip.
I’m still waiting for the Mac version to emerge. It’s shameful for me to borrow windows machines to test it out.
Nora Abercrombie | Editors of Walrus, please contract writers to provide articles that have been thoroughly researched and are important to Canadians. Shame on you for publishing this.
Rob | The main problem with Vancouverites is that most of them have never left to experience life outside of Vancouver. This combined with the constant bombardment of how Vancouver is one of the top cities to live in the world leads to the...
Holly | Everyone’s experience in a place is particular. Particular to one’s income, life stage, proximity to family, tastes, personality, interests, and chance encounters that build or don’t build into friendships. These things...
Vladimir | Don’t worry man true spirit of this art will never die! there are a lot of us that don’t give a shit about money, commercial, and selling out YEARS and years and years of training ! we all invest tremendous amount of time to...
Dan Iaboni | Hey man… Someone who scans google (i guess) linked me to this article. If you are still in the Toronto area, come over to the MonkeyVault sometime and play, its on me!
Traverse Davies | Nice article. The group is still out training three times a week here in Halifax, and we are still not commercial. I think that if the commercial interests win, groups like Halifax Parkour will just stop calling what we do...
Janet Wilson | I have not seen the film, but did hear the CBC interview with the filmaker with Jian Gomeshi on Q. There are two things I have to offer to the discussion, one on the “family” side, one not. First, in the nature vs....
